Selected Works Turkeyana Redesign  ·  Case study
Clinic Website · 2021

Turkeyana Redesign

A full redesign to earn the trust of an international audience.

ResearchWireframingUX/UI DesignPrototypingResponsive Web
Turkeyana Redesign cover
Product overview

Turkeyana Clinic serves patients from around the world. Its site looked dated and didn't turn international visitors into booked consultations. The redesign rebuilt the visual identity, the operation pages and the consultation funnel as a responsive, multilingual-ready system.

Tools
DesignFigmaUI design, components & prototyping
DesignAdobe XDUI design & prototyping
Hand-offZeplinSpecs & developer hand-off
ResearchHotjarHeatmaps & session recordings
Problem statement

The old site undersold the clinic's quality and made the consultation request hard to find, especially for non-Turkish-speaking visitors.

For a medical decision made from another country, trust is the entire interface.
Goals
1

Modernize the visual identity

2

Clarify the consultation funnel

3

Build a responsive, multilingual-ready system

Design process
01

Discover

Site analytics, heatmaps, session recordings and five past-patient interviews.

02

Define

Synthesizing findings into clear problems, user goals, flows, and the information architecture.

03

Design

Wireframes to high-fidelity UI, built on a component system and refined through iteration.

04

Deliver

Prototype flows and interface specifications, with validation priorities identified for the next stage.

Target audience
Primary

International patients (25–55) researching hair transplant and aesthetic procedures from abroad, mostly on mobile.

Secondary

Local patients comparing clinics, and partner agencies referring patients.

User research

Method Analytics review, heatmaps and session recordings, 5 remote interviews with past patients

78%
of first visits on mobile
5
past-patient interviews
3
languages required at launch
  • Visitors want detailed procedure information
  • Visitors need a brief, actionable consultation to help them decide
  • Mobile was the primary device for first contact
  • Before/after results and real doctors were the most-viewed content
Competitive analysis
Task / dimensionAnonymized clinic reference AAnonymized clinic reference BTurkeyana Redesign
Procedure informationShort-form information in project notesLong-form information in project notesStages, results and FAQ structure
Consultation entryForm-based entry in project notesMessaging-based entry in project notesGuided consultation request
Mobile layoutResponsive behavior not documentedResponsive behavior not documentedMobile-first responsive layout
Language coverageLanguage coverage not documentedLanguage coverage not documentedMultilingual-ready design system
Design focusClinic referenceClinic referenceProcedure information and consultation clarity

Anonymized references from the project notes. Identities, reviewed versions and review dates are not documented here, so these observations are not presented as a current competitor audit.

Design features
Feature 01

Operations, explained

Every procedure gets a structured page — what it is, stages, before/after and concerns — instead of a paragraph and a phone number.

Feature 02

Graft calculator

A simple calculator on hair-transplant pages gives visitors a concrete estimate and a reason to start a consultation.

Feature 03

Guided consultation

A four-step request — concern, details, photos, contact — replaces a long form and works on a phone.

Feature 04

Editorial trust

Blogs, doctor profiles and results give the site the credibility of a medical institution rather than a marketing page.

Site analytics
First visits from mobile78%
Visitors from outside Turkey71%
Sessions viewing before/after content64%
Old consultation form abandoned before submit69%
Sample
90d

of site analytics (all sessions) · plus 5 past-patient interviews for the qualitative findings

Design implications

The mobile share, interest in before-and-after content and consultation-form abandonment informed a mobile-first layout and clearer procedure pages. These descriptive figures do not establish a causal increase in consultation requests.

Empathy map
Mapped forDaniel, 41 · researching a hair transplant from London
Says
  • "How many grafts would I need?"
  • "Are these results real?"
  • "Can I talk to someone before I fly?"
Thinks
  • Cheap is scary; credible is worth it
  • I'll compare three clinics tonight
  • If the site is sloppy, the clinic might be
Does
  • Reads on his phone late at night
  • Looks for doctor names and photos
  • Messages clinics and waits for replies
Feels
  • Anxious about the decision
  • Reassured by clear stages and results
  • Confident when the consultation is easy
Pain points
✕

Dated visuals undermine credibility

✕

Consultation request is hard to find

✕

Procedure information is thin and unstructured

✕

Content isn't built for non-Turkish visitors

User persona
DH
Daniel Hughes
Age41JobSales DirectorLocationLondon, UK

Daniel has been considering a hair transplant for two years and is now comparing clinics in İstanbul. He wants clear information on the procedure, honest results and an easy way to get a professional opinion before booking flights.

Personality
  • Cautious
  • Research-driven
  • Values professionalism
  • Mobile-first
Goals
  • Understand the procedure and cost drivers
  • Verify the clinic's credibility
  • Get a consultation without a phone call
Pain points
  • Vague procedure information
  • Hard-to-find contact paths
  • Promotional, untrustworthy sites
Motivations
  • Confidence in a medical decision
  • A clear plan before travelling
  • Being treated as a patient, not a lead
User journey
Stage 01Land
Homepage
Stage 02Explore
Operations
Stage 03Understand
Operation details
Stage 04Trust
Blogs & results
Stage 05Act
Consultation
ActionsArrives from search on mobile, scans the heroBrowses operations by area, opens hair transplantReads stages, uses the graft calculatorReads a blog on recovery, looks at resultsCompletes the 4-step consultation request
Thoughts"This looks like a real clinic.""Everything is organised by concern.""About 3,000 grafts — okay.""They explain the risks too.""That took two minutes."
EmotionCautiousOrientedInformedReassuredConfident
OpportunityCalm hero + clear CTAOperations grouped by body areaStages + calculator on the pageEditorial content and real resultsShort, mobile-first consultation flow
High fidelity screens
Turkeyana Redesign – Homepage
Screen 1

Homepage

A calm hero, the clinic's promise and direct paths into operations — designed for a first visit on a phone.

Turkeyana Redesign – Operation details
Screen 2

Operation details

Stages of the procedure, before-operation guidance and the graft calculator on one page, so the visitor leaves with an estimate.

Turkeyana Redesign – Consultation
Screen 3

Consultation

A guided four-step request — concern, details, photos, contact — replacing the buried form on the old site.

Other screens

2 more screens from the final design — tap any to enlarge.

Key takeaways
01

Credibility beats urgency

The redesign prioritizes credible results, clear procedure information and accessible consultation entry points. Their effect on qualified inquiries requires post-launch measurement.

02

Structure is trust

Turning procedures into structured pages with stages and FAQs answered the questions visitors had been asking on WhatsApp.

03

Design for the first device

Building mobile-first matched how international patients actually arrive, and simplified every decision after.